Parallel Flaws [300-page free LSAT course]

Free LSAT Course > Logical Reasoning > Parallelism > Parallel Flaw

Similar to Principle questions, Parallel Reasoning questions will ask you to match reasoning. These questions may sometimes ask to match fallacious reasoning.

CHALLENGE: Find a similar flaw

Parallel Flaw questions are focused on finding the conclusion and are easily identifiable. These questions are phrased like this:

Which one of the following contains a flaw that most closely parallels the flaw contained in the passage?

Intro (0:01) | Ex.1 (1:47) | Ex.2 (11:46) | Ex.3 (16:01) | Trap Choices (20:27)
LSAT Lab offers six classes a week. Register for a free demo class.

Free Weekly LSATLab Seminars

Site-sponsor LSAT Lab offers six online seminars a week on specific LSAT question types.

Free "Starter" Course

Take a free official LSAT

25+ hours of LSAT instructional videos

Free class demo: Join one of six weekly classes focusing on a single LSAT question topic. Instructor Matt Sherman scored a 176 and has spent 17 years teaching the LSAT and developing curricula for elite LSAT prep companies.

LSATLab Demo / Free LSAT

LSATLab Demo: More Upcoming Seminars

Next LSAT: January 13th

{"first_video":"7rbROb6kwkk","testData":[{"videoId":"7rbROb6kwkk","videoLoopStart":"1.5","videoLoopEnd":"2.5","VideoEnd":"462","videoCustomization":"","correct":"A","explanation":"0:00 - This is a Match the Flaws<\/i> question. The correct answer will exhibit a very similar type of flaw to the one in the stimulus. | \n0:37 - For this type of question, it helps to write the argument down into its conclusion and support. | \n0:50 - Read the stimulus. Try to locate the critic`s opinion and why they think their opinion is true. | \n1:15 - The conclusion is: <q>The contemporary novel is incapable of making important new contributions.<\/q> | \n1:40 - The support is the negative aspects noted about contemporary psychological, action, and romance novels. | \n2:10 - The argument`s flaw is that the conclusion addresses contemporary novels in general,<\/b> but the evidence is based on just a few specific<\/b> examples. | \n3:05 - In addition, just because these types of novels have failed doesn`t mean that they will continue to fail. | \n3:19 - Evaluate the choices and look for an argument that exhibits a similar flaw. | \n3:30 - (A) shows the same strong language as the stimulus. It also assumes a general conclusion from specific evidence. This is similar to the stimulus` assumption, so the correct answer is (A). | \n4:30 - The argument in (B) has a different flaw; it makes a jump between what has been accomplished and what will be accomplished. | \n5:05 - (C) doesn`t have the same strong language as the conclusion in the stimulus. And it deals with what will happen in the future, not with what is happening right now. | \n5:40 - (D) makes a shift from what someone has done to what someone thinks, which is different from the flaw in the stimulus. | \n6:20 - (E) assumes that just because one thing is best suited, another is not suited at all. This is not the same as the flaw in the stimulus. | \n7:05 - Recap.","explanationBreaks":"0:00 - This is a Match the Flaws<\/i> question. The correct answer will exhibit a very similar type of flaw to the one in the stimulus. \n0:37 - For this type of question, it helps to write the argument down into its conclusion and support. \n0:50 - Read the stimulus. Try to locate the critic`s opinion and why they think their opinion is true. \n1:15 - The conclusion is: <q>The contemporary novel is incapable of making important new contributions.<\/q> \n1:40 - The support is the negative aspects noted about contemporary psychological, action, and romance novels. \n2:10 - The argument`s flaw is that the conclusion addresses contemporary novels in general,<\/b> but the evidence is based on just a few specific<\/b> examples. \n3:05 - In addition, just because these types of novels have failed doesn`t mean that they will continue to fail. \n3:19 - Evaluate the choices and look for an argument that exhibits a similar flaw. \n3:30 - (A) shows the same strong language as the stimulus. It also assumes a general conclusion from specific evidence. This is similar to the stimulus` assumption, so the correct answer is (A). \n4:30 - The argument in (B) has a different flaw; it makes a jump between what has been accomplished and what will be accomplished. \n5:05 - (C) doesn`t have the same strong language as the conclusion in the stimulus. And it deals with what will happen in the future, not with what is happening right now. \n5:40 - (D) makes a shift from what someone has done to what someone thinks, which is different from the flaw in the stimulus. \n6:20 - (E) assumes that just because one thing is best suited, another is not suited at all. This is not the same as the flaw in the stimulus. \n7:05 - Recap.","clockPosition":"TR","imageThumb":"https:\/\/www.lsat-center.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/yt_thumbs\/31_7rbROb6kwkk.jpg","categoryId":"8","id":"31"}]}